![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgmONDnWDAIvEqYh-qrW-ftV2yIBAmbwomlKoAJr_DAJ4in8EeOMOZ2V3pQgpqkgLowzlA3jWw54m8Jd-qOftxPbg950rGKCWgeM7Tm8fm3tmKIDuvu_VGC4KCVMgWWayG2INf4Q/s400/blogstatsbymonth2011.png)
- and here's the yearly one:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhBIm_ww1F5rRjMKkbakyG7eQzVUJN26e51y2buMjO4I_KudX6hWkk0PUu30NC5ujfOJNO60SbMwReD4lVIYsJt64bZjeQPOMbOi58vy_XSi99ZdrR2lOXN69Yf5Ms7wWUlx2l5w/s400/blogstatsbyyear2011.png)
There is one crumb of statistical comfort to be gleaned from all this doom and gloom, though: not only does the 33 book reviews among those 150 posts represent the highest book-related-blogging:other-stuff-related-blogging ratio ever achieved at 22% (comfortably beating 2010's 13.7%), but it's also the highest absolute number of book reviews posted in a year, beating the previous figure of 28 held jointly by 2007 and 2009. Here's the graph:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0mSrB-g9vL26o0sAWucZv1vuhPuTCt4RZilkT_12bmwkjTaJt1T1hUUx5mpdqRatpfvq_DyShMire9-fdDlek1Qcw9T_J_259VrIH-6rDP9W50G2wvlIX9BbbZoZxBLOGV5UFNA/s400/bookblogpercentagebyyear2011.png)
2 comments:
Just to prove I do read it ...
"2011 yielding just 150 posts, a decrease of some 14% even compared with the slim 175 posts I managed in 2011" makes no sense.
Um, yeah, that's true. I've corrected it now.
Post a Comment