The US Open prides itself on its reputation as the hardest major to shoot low scores at; it's therefore slightly surprising that three of the first five 63s (Miller, Nicklaus, Weiskopf) were posted at that tournament. Since then, though, there have been two in thirty-seven years - Vijay Singh at Olympia Fields in 2003 and now Thomas.
Thomas' 63 was of the long-putt-on-the-last-green variety, rather than the missing-a-putt-for-a-62 variety, as he achieved it via the fairly extraordinary feat of eagling the last hole, which measured 667 yards. I don't know off the top of my head whether posting 63 by eagling the 18th is a unique feat; I strongly suspect that it is. Slightly surprisingly Greg Norman's 1986 feat of posting a 63 by bogeying the last hole is not unique; Mark Hayes in 1977 did the same thing.
Player | Tournament | Year | Round | Result | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Miller | US Open | 1973 | final | WON | Johnny Miller |
Bruce Crampton | USPGA | 1975 | second | 2nd | Jack Nicklaus |
Mark Hayes | Open | 1977 | second | tied 9th | Tom Watson |
Jack Nicklaus | US Open | 1980 | first | WON | Jack Nicklaus |
Tom Weiskopf | US Open | 1980 | first | 37th | Jack Nicklaus |
Isao Aoki | Open | 1980 | third | tied 12th | Tom Watson |
Raymond Floyd | USPGA | 1982 | first | WON | Raymond Floyd |
Gary Player | USPGA | 1984 | second | tied 2nd | Lee Trevino |
Nick Price | Masters | 1986 | third | 5th | Jack Nicklaus |
Greg Norman | Open | 1986 | second | WON | Greg Norman |
Paul Broadhurst | Open | 1990 | third | tied 12th | Nick Faldo |
Jodie Mudd | Open | 1991 | final | tied 5th | Ian Baker-Finch |
Nick Faldo | Open | 1993 | second | 2nd | Greg Norman |
Payne Stewart | Open | 1993 | final | 12th | Greg Norman |
Vijay Singh | USPGA | 1993 | second | 4th | Paul Azinger |
Michael Bradley | USPGA | 1995 | first | tied 54th | Steve Elkington |
Brad Faxon | USPGA | 1995 | final | 5th | Steve Elkington |
Greg Norman | Masters | 1996 | first | 2nd | Nick Faldo |
Jose Maria Olazabal | USPGA | 2000 | third | tied 4th | Tiger Woods |
Mark O’Meara | USPGA | 2001 | second | tied 22nd | David Toms |
Vijay Singh | US Open | 2003 | second | tied 20th | Jim Furyk |
Thomas Bjorn | USPGA | 2005 | third | tied 2nd | Phil Mickelson |
Tiger Woods | USPGA | 2007 | second | WON | Tiger Woods |
Rory McIlroy | Open | 2010 | first | tied 3rd | Louis Oosthuizen |
Steve Stricker | USPGA | 2011 | first | tied 12th | Keegan Bradley |
Jason Dufner | USPGA | 2013 | second | WON | Jason Dufner |
Hiroshi Iwata | USPGA | 2015 | second | tied 21st | Jason Day |
Phil Mickelson | Open | 2016 | first | 2nd | Henrik Stenson |
Henrik Stenson | Open | 2016 | final | WON | Henrik Stenson |
Robert Streb | USPGA | 2016 | second | tied 7th | Jimmy Walker |
Justin Thomas | US Open | 2017 | third | tied 9th | Brooks Koepka |
A couple of vaguely contentious observations to finish with:
- Erin Hills was the second new US Open course in three years. Now I know that Chambers Bay in 2015 copped quite a bit of criticism from everything from the quality of the greens (which were atrocious) to the unfairness of some of the run-off areas (criticism which could equally well be levelled at Augusta, but never is, because, you know, tradition and that). I think in general bringing new courses into the rota (which the USGA also did with Bethpage Black in 2002 and Torrey Pines in 2008) is a commendable thing to do, though, and something that the R&A could learn from with regard to the Open Championship. Course-wise the most revolutionary things they've done lately are to bring back some previously-used courses into the rota: Royal St. George's in 1981 (after a 32-year gap), Carnoustie in 1999 (after a 24-year gap) and Royal Liverpool aka Hoylake in 2006 (after a 39-year gap). They've done the same with Royal Portrush (after a 68-year gap since its only previous Open) for 2019, which I applaud, but what about introducing something new? Maybe an old traditional links course like Royal Porthcawl, or something a bit funkier like Kingsbarns? No choice would meet with universal approval but it would at least demonstrate the ability of the fusty old farts who comprise the R&A to think outside the box a bit. Some more food for thought here.
- Secondly, as magnificent as the two shots were that Justin Thomas hit to get on to the 18th green in two and give himself the eagle putt that he subsequently holed for a 63, it is somewhat ridiculous that he could go 3-wood, 3-wood, putt on a 667-yard hole. The discussion about golf equipment improvements and the constant increases in length that they bring is an old and hoary one and never seems to go anywhere, but most people seem to agree what the answer would be: specify some standard ball composition that all the pros have to use. Many people are wary of this, primarily as it might kill the golden goose of lucrative golf ball endorsements that the players currently make a fortune from, but, you know, they don't let Andy Murray bring his own balls to Wimbledon, he has to make do with what he's given. The obvious sporting precedent here is javelin-throwing, where numerous regulation changes regarding composition and aerodynamic properties of projectiles have been made over the last thirty years or so. Admittedly the consequences of doing nothing were rather more serious, involving members of the public being literally impaled in their seats, and the market of amateur javelinists wanting celebrity-endorsed products is rather smaller than it is for golf balls.